Category Archives: Uncategorized

Malala Persisted

Malala Persisted—perSISTERS print, part of the #FemalePowerProject honoring Malala Yousafzai.

This print for Malala Yousafzai (born 12 July 1997) is the third design I’ve made for her. I started the Female Power Project in 2015 with shawl and scarf designs honoring Malala, and they are called “A girl With a Book.” (The blog post I made at this time shows pictures of some of the images I’ve referenced in this post.) This text refers to some of the design elements in the shawls and scarves, not all of which I have used in this print design. But I include reference to them here because I think people might find this design research interesting.

I’ve asked friends and strangers about their female heroes. In fact, now that I am often selling directly at street fairs and similar venues, I see this input from the public who enter my booth as part of the creative process, its performative aspect. The first shawl design I finished, called “A Girl with a Book,” is in honor of Malala Yousafzai, the young woman who campaigned for girls’ education in Pakistan, was shot by a Taliban man, fought hard to survive the shooting, kept working for her cause, won the Nobel Peace Prize for her accomplishments (at 16!), is now a student at Oxford University in the UK, and continues to work for every child’s right to an education. While still a teen, she founded the Malala Fund, an international, non-profit organization that fights for girls’ education. A portion of the proceeds from the Female Power Project goes to the Malala Fund.

To design the shawl I did research on the visual culture of the Swat Valley, the region of Pakistan where Malala was born. I discovered that one of the recurring motifs in the wood carving of the area is based on a woman’s neck ring. The neck ring shape, a nearly-round crescent with outer-facing ends, is pre-islamic, and is thought by anthropologists to be a symbol of female power because of its similarity to the shape of a crescent moon. It persisted even after the coming of Islam because a crescent is Islamic as well. There are several versions, one is a double twist. Although the text I read suggested that the ends look like bird heads, I think they might just as well be serpent heads. The snake is also often a symbol of female power. (The Arts and Crafts of the Swat Valley: Living Traditions in the Hindu Kush, by Johannes Kalter, 1989.)

I built a neck ring shape from various materials because I was interested in experiencing the motif as a physical thing, not just as a drawing. I made a couple versions and they both seem a little magical when I hold them. One version was wrapped and the other was twisted. The twisted version looks much more like two snakes. This is the one I scanned and used in the shawl design.

The shape also made me think of two hands held out, cupped, as if holding water—or holding a book. So I drew a motif of hands in the neck ring shape holding a book. The text on the shawl reads: “Extremists have shown what frightens them most: a girl with a book.” This is a Malala quote used by Amnesty International. I like this sentence because, on the one hand, it is calling the Taliban cowards because they are afraid of a little girl and everyone knows that girls are weak and harmless [sic!]. On the other hand, it suggests that it really is a very powerful thing for a girl to reach into the world and seize knowledge for herself. They should be afraid if their ideology dictates that women should remain ignorant. It is not a secret that the lifting of the status of women lifts up a whole society.

I also read Malala’s memoir, I Am Malala, which I recommend to everyone. She writes lovingly of her homeland. She holds fast to her Muslim faith and describes how the Koran encourages women on their path to knowledge. She tells a compelling story that describes how extremism takes hold of a society. She describes how the Taliban moved into her land and slowly won over people through rhetoric and intimidation. Then they started destroying schools and assassinating people. Their tactics were designed to breed fear and conformity. She held to her conviction that it is not a crime to seek an education. In this she was supported by her educator/activist father and her illiterate mother. Again and again we see the importance of committed fathers in the nurturing of strong women.  The day that Malala was shot, in a school bus delivering her home from school, her mother was attending her own first reading lesson.

QUESTION — Kamala Harris redux

FemalePowerProject Kamala Harris
QUESTION — #FemalePowerProject perSISTERS print honoring Senator Kamala Harris

Kamala Devi Harris (born October 20, 1964) is the junior Senator from California. Before that she served as Attorney General of California. Harris was born in Oakland, California. She is the daughter of an Indian mother—a cancer researcher who emigrated in 1960—and a Jamaican-American father who is an economics professor. (Wikipedia)

This is the second perSISTERS print I’ve made for Kamala Harris. The first design, INSIST, was made in response to her being interrupted numerous times during Senate Intel hearings in June 2017. Nevertheless, she insisted on her right to question and get an answer.

On September 5, 2018, Senator Harris asked some powerful questions during the second confirmation hearing for Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh. The nominee had difficulty answering her. The question about laws governing female bodies vs male bodies gets to the heart of the abortion rights issue, avoiding the excuse of the “Ginsburg Standard,” which Kavanaugh said he was following when he refused to answer questions about Roe v. Wade, even though he has, in fact, a written record objecting to that decision, and so would not be divulging new information about how he might rule as a Supreme Court judge. A nominee should not divulge how he or she may rule on a particular case because the judiciary should remain independent of any promises. However, the nominee may, and SHOULD, divulge his or her thinking about the principles underlying a particular precedent, and whether the nominee agrees with the soundness of those principles, or constitutional interpretations.

According to the National Women’s Law Center (NWLC), this portrayal of Justice Ginsburg’s hearings and the Ginsburg Standard is not accurate. Here I will quote at length from the NWLC:

Claims are being made that Ruth Bader Ginsburg refused to answer questions about her views on abortion and the right to privacy and liberty during her Supreme Court confirmation hearings in 1993, and that Judge Kavanaugh should follow her example. In fact, Kavanaugh made these claims when he was nominated to the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

This portrayal of Justice Ginsburg’s hearings is not accurate. The truth is that Justice Ginsburg did the exact opposite. Then-Judge Ginsburg did answer Senators’ questions on abortion and the right to privacy—in fact, she spoke at length about her views.

Here is Justice Ginsburg’s response to then-Senator Hank Brown’s question about the constitutional underpinnings of the right to abortion:
“[Y]ou asked me about my thinking about equal protection versus individual autonomy, and my answer to you is it is both. This is something central to a woman’s life, to her dignity. It is a decision that she must make for herself. And when government controls that decision for her, she is being treated as less than a fully adult human responsible for her own choices.” (Nomination of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, to be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, Hearings Before the Senate Comm. on the Judiciary, 103rd Cong. 207 (1993)).

And here is her answer to a question by Senator Leahy about whether there is a constitutional right to privacy:
“There is a constitutional right to privacy which consists I think of at least two distinguishable parts. One is the privacy expressed most vividly in the Fourth Amendment, that is the government shall not break into my home or my office, without a warrant, based on probable cause, the government shall leave me alone. The other is the notion of personal autonomy, the government shall not make my decisions for me, I shall make, as an individual, uninhibited, uncontrolled by my government, the decisions that affect my life’s course.” (Ginsburg Nomination Hearings, 185).

Additionally, then-Judge Ginsburg had a very extensive record of opinions and articles when she appeared before the Judiciary Committee, giving Senators an ample basis on which to determine her views on important legal issues – which is not the case with Judge Kavanaugh. As the 1993 Judiciary Committee report on the Ginsburg nomination said:
“[E]ach member of the committee had ample means, prior to Judge Ginsburg’s hearing, to discover much pertinent information—indeed, the most pertinent information—about Judge Ginsburg’s judicial approach and method. In more than 300 signed appellate opinions, and more than three score articles, Judge Ginsburg told the Senate and the American people an enormous amount about herself even before the hearings opened.” (Ginsburg Nomination Rept., 40).

Indeed, the Judiciary Committee’s report on the Ginsburg nomination concluded that “the committee knows far more about Judge Ginsburg’s views on reproductive rights than it has known about any previous nominee’s. Judge Ginsburg’s record and testimony suggest both a broad commitment to reproductive freedoms and a deep appreciation of the equality and autonomy values underlying them.” (Nomination of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, to be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, Sen. Exec. Rept. No. 103-6, at 39 (1993)).

Attempts to claim a “Ginsburg standard” that would allow Judge Kavanaugh to refuse to explain his views on the rights to privacy, liberty, and abortion are disingenuous excuses.

Rather, Judge Kavanaugh should follow Justice Ginsburg’s example and be forthcoming in his confirmation hearings. He must answer whether or not he believes the Constitution protects the individual right of all people to make personal decisions about their bodies and relationships, including the right to use contraception and to have an abortion.

A NOTE ON THE DESIGN

I was so happy to be able to use a capital Q in a perSISTERS design. This is definitely my favorite character. The capital Q is often an eccentric letter in a typeface, an eccentricity that is most often hidden because this letter is so rarely used in the English language. Because this flamboyant letter is kept “in the closet” I took it upon my self, in 1997, to create an artists book about this letter. I have three posts about this work, here, here, and here. The Q in this perSISTER design is from the typeface BeLucian Ultra. The book weight version is used for the name “Lucian” in the book, as in queen, the abecedarium of a typophiliac by Leda Black, Palabra Press, 1997 and a Blurb edition, 2015.

SOURCES

https://nwlc.org/resources/the-ginsburg-standard-requires-judge-kavanaugh-to-give-full-and-complete-answers-to-questions-about-liberty-privacy-and-abortion/

https://www.facebook.com/USSenateDemocrats/videos/sen-harris-explains-the-ginsburg-standard-to-judge-kavanaugh/253038132016219/

https://www.npr.org/2018/07/13/628711698/the-reality-of-the-ginsburg-rule

The image of Ms. Harris is based on a screen shot from the video clip “Kamala Harris Interrupted at Intel Senate Hearing” from CNN. (http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2017/06/07/watch_two_republican_men_try_to_shush_kamala_harris_in_a_senate_hearing.html)

Siouxsie Sioux Takes Command

TAKE COMMAND #FemalePowerProject perSISTERS poster honoring Siouxsie Sioux

This design was a personal commission for my daughter’s birthday. She had mentioned more than once that I might want to do a perSISTERS poster for Siouxsie Sioux. And then it was going to be her birthday and I thought I would do one especially for her. You might be able to tell that I have to devote some time to research for each perSISTER so that I can try to get to the essence of a woman’s power or gift. Well, I found out that Siouxsie Sioux really is amazing, and here is what I discovered:

“I do remember wanting to come across as all-powerful and I wanted to kind of make it painful for people.”

Siouxsie Sioux (Born Susan Janet Ballion on 27 May 1957), has been called “one of the most influential British singers of the rock era” because of her work with her revolutionary band, Siouxsie and the Banshees. Her musical genres are called “Post-punk, new wave, gothic rock, alternative rock, and exotica,” although in interviews she resists most labels. About her difficult youth she has said, “growing up in the suburbs you’re always very aware of being different. You want desperately to just not stick out. Thankfully as I grew older I kind of appreciated the difference and, I guess, accentuated it.”

This is adapted from Wikipedia (mostly) and several interviews available online:

At 17, she left school. It was during this period that she began frequenting the local gay discos where most of her sister’s friends used to go. She introduced her own friends to that scene. In November 1975, a new young group called Sex Pistols performed at the local art college in Chislehurst. Siouxsie did not attend, but one of her friends told her how their singer threatened the string of students present at that gig. In February 1976, Siouxsie and her friend Steven Severin (then still called Steven Bailey) went to see Sex Pistols play in the capital. After chatting with members of the band, Siouxsie and Severin decided to follow them regularly. In the following months, journalist Caroline Coon coined the term “Bromley Contingent” to describe this group of eccentric teenagers devoted to the Sex Pistols.

Siouxsie became well known in the London club scene for her glam, fetish and bondage attire, which later became part of punk fashion. She would also later epitomise gothic style with her signature cat-eye makeup, deep red lipstick, spiky dyed-black hair and black clothing. One music critic has pointed out, “She was overtly sexual on a level, but not for anyone’s pleasure but her own.”

One of Siouxsie’s first public appearances was with the Sex Pistols on Bill Grundy’s television show, on Thames Television in December 1976. Standing next to the band, Siouxsie made fun of the presenter when he asked her how she was doing. She responded: “I’ve always wanted to meet you, Bill”. Grundy, who was drunk, suggested a meeting after the show. That directly provoked a reaction from guitarist Steve Jones, who responded with a series of expletives never heard before on early-evening television. This episode created a media furore on the front covers of several tabloids, including the Daily Mirror, which published the headline “Siouxsie’s a Punk Shocker”. This event had a major impact on Sex Pistols’ subsequent career, and overnight, they became a household name.

Not liking the cliches put forward by the press, Siouxsie distanced herself from that scene and stopped seeing Sex Pistols. She decided to focus all her energy on her own band, Siouxsie and the Banshees…

Following the adage of DIY and the idea that the people in the audience could be the people on stage, Siouxsie and Severin decided to form a band. When a support slot at the 100 Club Punk Festival (organised by Malcolm McLaren) opened up, they decided to make an attempt at performing, although at that time they did not know how to play any songs. On 20 September 1976, the band improvised music as Siouxsie sang the “Lord’s Prayer”. The performance lasted 20 minutes.

For critic Jon Savage, Siouxsie was “unlike any female singer before or since, commanding yet aloof, entirely modern.” She opened a new era for women in music as Viv Albertine from the Slits would later comment:

“Siouxsie just appeared fully made, fully in control, utterly confident. It totally blew me away. There she was doing something that I dared to dream but she took it and did it and it wiped the rest of the festival for me, that was it. I can’t even remember everything else about it except that one performance”.

The singer from Radiohead, Thom Yorke, said: “The band that really changed my life was R.E.M. and Siouxsie and the Banshees …”. “My favourite show I ever saw then was Siouxsie and she was absolutely amazing. … She’s totally in command of the whole audience”. Yorke added that she “made an especially big impression in concert, she was really sexy but absolutely terrifying.”

Siouxsie Sioux is still making music, evading categories, and taking command. “I was doing what I wanted to do.”