Please pardon the rolling randomness you will be seeing over the next few weeks. Feel free to contact me if something looks pathetically broken to you.
Best regards,
The Creatrix who mostly does all the things herself
Writing about the “La Guadalupana” shawl
Suzanne Kulperger Photography made some amazing photos for me of the first object I ever made in the Female Power Project. So I am taking this opportunity to finally post the text I finally wrote for this piece in 2022. You can order the shawl and scarf for La Guadalupana on my Etsy site at this link.
Her attention reminds us that we are human.
Let me explain how this design for the Virgin of Guadalupe was the beginning of the Female Power Project.
In 2015 the Pope came to Washington D.C. and celebrated mass at the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception, near my studio. I wanted to make some shawls that people might buy when they came to see him. As usually happens for me, the project took longer than I thought, and the pieces I created were not ready in time! Still, I pressed ahead with production.
Why did I choose the Virgin of Guadalupe for the project? Primarily, she was part of where I grew up, literally part of my geography, because the street where I grew up in New Mexico was a dead end road that came off a road called Guadalupe Trail. She was everywhere I looked in the Spanish culture of New Mexico and the Latinx culture around me in California and Texas, places I lived later. So when I wanted a Catholic image that was meaningful to me, the Virgin of Guadalupe came first to mind.
At that time I hadn’t made work with religious imagery. Since then I have made more such works, enough that I named a series for them: the Divines. I am fascinated by religious images, symbols, and stories because they seem to have a direct access into our brains, more than other images. Since La Guadalupana was at the beginning of the Project, at the time I hadn’t developed a method for making or writing about divine females. I now understand better what I am doing in the Divines Series: I don’t retell the stories or depict the deities, I interpret aspects of the stories in reworked images and reinterpret their messages in the context of my point of view as a non-religious feminist, living here and now.
The Virgin of Guadalupe is Mexico’s Virgin Mary. There is an important story for the Mexican and Mexican-American people about Mary appearing to and communicating with a local man, Juan Diego. This is a true story to the people, but it is not corroborated in the historic records of the time. The story involves local prelates, in the upper hierarchy, but there is no church record of the events, and there should be if the story is historical. It looks like the story was published later to help legitimize a legend and a cult that had developed over time. According to my research, the Church resisted acknowledging Mary’s visit to Mexico, and the cult of the Virgin that arose in Tepeyac, until it was impossible to deny for political and social reasons. The visitation, which was supposed to have taken place in the 1550s, cannot be separated from the complicated politics of the Mexican Church 100 years later, when the story was published and later accepted by the Church.
A more recent Guadalupana story is that her cult at Tepeyac arose on the site of a shrine sacred to an Aztec goddess called Tonanzin. The implication is that somehow Guadalupana worship was really Tonanzin worship, or a mash-up of the two. But this also should be questioned. As Rosemary Radford Ruether writes in Goddesses and the Divine Feminine, A Western Religious History, “Tonanzin was a title for the maternal aspect of any Aztec goddess, not the name of a particular goddess.” Therefore, a local person referring to the Virgin as “Tonanzin” was saying she is a holy mother, which is not unchristian. The locals calling Mary “Tonantzin” did worry the priests. They were very anxious about the purity of the object of worship of the native people. This anxiety was behind the institutional resistance to the Guadalupana cult. Any native-derived worship must be demonic, they thought.
So these cherished stories about the Virgin of Guadalupe are … complicated. But I maintain that powerful stories are meaningful even if they are not true in a literal or historic sense. I like to ask how they are meaningful, and, in this case, why is this design meaningful to me: an artist, an atheist, feminist, Jew?
Why might La Guadalupana be so important to Mexican identity? I think I may have found at least part of an answer recently in the book Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents by Isabel Wilkerson (pub. 2020). She writes that Christian colonizers did not consider the non-Christians they met to be human. The colonizers were allowed by their laws and customs to treat these people like animals, or like any other exploitable natural resource. Once the colonized people became Christians, they and their mixed-blood descendants did gain some human dignity in the eyes of the colonizers, and were absorbed into the caste system, although they were considered to be lower caste, or even “untouchable.” When I read this I immediately thought of the native Nahuas having their own Virgin Mary speaking to them. She even required a native man to carry a message to a member of the Church hierarchy, and when the Church man doubted Juan Diego, the Virgin produced a miracle to prove Juan Diego was worthy of her (and his) attention. This was proof that the people in Mexico must be real Christians, that is, human beings. This was proof that Mexico is a place in Christendom, and not a place outside of civilization. The place of worship of La Guadalupana was established by her, and that place is Mexico.
Although I created the La Guadalupana shawl in 2015, I am writing this now in 2022. It’s taken me till now to think of ways to frame this design, and talk about its message in the context of the Female Power Project. It is very easy for me to get lost in historical detail, so I had to let my researches settle for a while, to let the details fade and the edges get rounded, so I could find a figure in the noise.
The shawl references parts of the divine image of La Guadalupana at her shrine in Mexico: the mantle of stars she wears (I especially love this idea of wearing the sky); the flames representing rays of light; and the clouds around the flames. The roses, out of season and of a different region, are a miracle that proves the divine message to the sceptical curate. These things depict Mary’s situation, but not her self.
It is amazing that a divine mother has persisted even in a patriarchal faith. It often seems to me that female power pushes through fissures in history, because our species needs it. Here is the message as I understand it: Mary did not forsake her child, and her power is mercy. Her cult is of devotion, more than worship, and the emotion she embodies is love without fear. Her attention makes us human, as she had made human her son, and she mediates between humans and the non-female divine. People who wear the shawl will have their own meanings, of course.
Back in 2015, I remember standing in front of a mirror in my studio, near that Basilica, trying on the shawl I had just finished, and something seemed to happen, because I felt like I was putting on the power of someone else, like in a ritual. I found it remarkable and meaningful, in a quiet way. (No fireworks!) My very next thought was, I wonder what other women I can make a shawl for, so that I can put on their power, too?
And that, dear reader, was the beginning of the Female Power Project: my explorations of the stories of transformative women and divine females made into images, words, and objects—messages that we can try on, powers that can fit us, or situations we can inhabit.
I think if I were Catholic, I might feel like the Virgin had sent me a message.
REWRITE the default, for Hansa Mehta
“As India’s delegate to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights from 1947–52, [Hansa Mehta] championed the case for a gender-neutral phrasing of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Mehta proposed the name of Eleanor Roosevelt as Chair of the committee that founded the Human Rights Commission and undertook the writing of an International Bill of Rights. The initial wording of Article 1 was ‘All men are born free and equal in dignity and rights.’ Roosevelt’s biographer Blanche Wiesen Cook (2006: 558) writes that Hansa Mehta, the only other woman on the Commission, ‘significantly transformed the document by her insistence that the words “all men” would in much of the world be taken to exclude women. Hansa Mehta influenced ER in many ways. The commission adopted her inclusive formula “all human beings” during its June 1948 session, and women’s equality was forevermore affirmed in UN literature.’”
from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/southasia/2022/09/12/hansa-mehta-an-early-indian-feminist/
“If not for Hansa Mehta, according to UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres’ statement from December 2018, ‘we would probably be speaking of the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Man rather than of Human Rights.’”
from https://thepaperclip.in/hansa-mehta-all-human-beings-are-born-free-and-equal/
Hansa Mehta was born on July 3, 1897, to a privileged household in the princely state of Baroda, now part of Gujarat state along the western coast of India. Hansa pursued an education beyond what was typical of a woman at her time: she graduated with honors from Baroda College with a degree in philosophy; she studied journalism and sociology at the London School of Economics; and she participated in an exchange program in San Francisco. While in London, Hansa became friends with feminist, poet, and Indian independence activist Sarojini Naidu, who was friends with and worked closely with Mahatma Gandhi. Through this friendship Hansa also became close to Gandhi. She and a group of women visited Gandhi jail and this visit had a profound affect on Hansa.
It would be hard to overemphasize the effect that Gandhi’s ideas about non-violent resistance have had on global freedom struggles. (For example, perSISTER Pauli Murray engaged with these ideas when she refused to leave her bus seat, and when she participated in lunch counter sit-ins with other Howard University students in Washington DC.)
Hansa married a man of a lower caste than hers, which caused a stir. She worked for women’s rights and Indian independence from England, organizing boycotts and participating in demonstrations. She and Kamala Nehru shouted revolutionary slogans in the Delhi train station, causing the British to blast the train whistles non-stop to drown them out. The increasing number of women revolutionaries caused trouble for the British rulers. Hansa was arrested and spent some time in jail.
Upon release from jail, Hansa became involved in electoral politics in India, running for provincial office and winning a seat. She worked toward social, economic, political, educational, and reproductive justice for all people.
Hansa worked within the All India Women’s Conference and became its president in 1946. There she drafted the Indian Woman’s Charter of Rights and Duties, which demanded education, equality, and civil rights for women. You can read this document at this link: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1494728?ln=en
Starting in 1946, Hansa Mehta served as a member of the United Nations sub-committee on the status of women before she became the vice-chair with Eleanor Roosevelt of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights Committee.
From 1946 to 1949, having been elected to the Constituent Assembly, Hansa sat at the tables to hash out the fundamental rights of the people of India and other details for their new constitution. Mehta was one of the 15 women framers of the Indian Constitution.
In the first few minutes of August 15, 1947, Hansa Mehta presented the new flag to the Constituent Assembly of the new nation of independent India, as a gift from the women of India. “It is in the fitness of things that this first flag that will fly over this august House should be a gift from the women of India!” She also presented “a list of nearly one hundred prominent women of all communities who have expressed a desire to associate themselves with this ceremonial” and stressed that there are hundreds and hundreds of women who want to contribute to the function of the government of the newly independent India. You can listen to her speech here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFC6_5yqM-U
Hansa Mehta served in many high caliber positions in academic administration in India, on the board of UNESCO, and she was also an author and translator. She died on April 4, 1995.
DESIGN NOTE
When looking for photographs of Hansa Mehta I found some examples on Ebay of printed postcards with her image, from the 1930s. I love the texture and color of this rather low-quality printing (by current standards). This led me to look up images of Indian vernacular typography like hand painted signs, match book printing, painted trucks. The bright colors, shadowed type, misregistered (not lined up) colors, blotchy halftone dots, I love it all. So this mode influenced my design for this print in the perSISTERS series.
See ebay print here (for a while, anyway: https://www.ebay.com/itm/404345693088). Also I found such good stuff to inspire me on Pinterest and you can too. Search for: Indian Street Signs, Truck art, match books.
The bars of color in the background (and the clor scheme of the print) are from the national flag of India, and the star burst shape is a riff on the Ashoka Chakra, also from the flag.
https://thewire.in/history/hansa-mehta-jivraj-sarojini-naidu-mahatma-gandhi-united-nations
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13540661221115957
A blog on hand painted signs in India
https://www.un.org/en/observances/human-rights-day/women-who-shaped-the-universal-declaration
https://ardra.medium.com/the-women-who-shaped-human-rights-at-the-un-3464a158e959
https://www.constitutionofindia.net/members/hansa-jivraj-mehta/
You must be logged in to post a comment.