Tag Archives: Feminist Art

Female Power Project, On My Mind, perSISTERS designs, What I'm Making, What I'm thinking about

Fannie Lou Hamer: Be inconvenient

Fannie Lou Hamer Feminist Art Feminist Graphics Protest Art Resistance Art Womanist
Be inconvenient — #FemalePowerProject perSISTERS poster honoring Fannie Lou Hamer

I’m not saying I’m finished with this new perSISTER design for the Female Power Project. But I will post updates if I change it. Regardless, Fannie Lou Hamer’s story will remain the same. Here goes:

Fannie Lou Hamer (October 6, 1917–March 14, 1977)

It was inconvenient to the racist white establishment of Mississippi when Hamer decided, at the age of 45, that she wanted to register to vote. She was prevented by an arbitrary literacy test and then fired by her boss (“we’re not ready for that in Mississippi”) and kicked out of her house and shot at by white supremacists. She failed the test a second time. On the third time she passed, but when she went to vote she was told she needed to have two poll tax receipts. She eventually did pay for the receipts and it was inconvenient that she finally did vote. The Voting Rights Act was passed to prevent such voter suppression. (See RBG)

It was inconvenient that Hamer had no sense. “I guess if I’d had any sense, I’d have been a little scared—but what was the point of being scared? The only thing they could do was kill me, and it kinda seemed like they’d been trying to do that a little bit at a time since I could remember.” (This fearlessness reminds me of Harriet Tubman’s)

It was inconvenient that Hamer had returned to Mississippi after attending a pro-citizenship conference in South Carolina. She was arrested and it took her a month to not-fully recover from the beating the police gave her. It was inconvenient that she never recovered because it proved the brutality of the white people in power there.

It was inconvenient that Hamer was so gifted at organizing voter registration drives like the Freedom Summer.

It was inconvenient that Hamer was so good at hosting and nurturing activists of all colors.

It was inconvenient that Hamer could quote a Bible passage to support every social justice initiative she embraced.

It was inconvenient when Hamer co-founded the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party to contest the legitimacy of the all-white “official delegation” to the 1964 Democratic convention from that state. It was so inconvenient that President Lyndon Johnson had to interrupt the broadcast of her testimony to the credentials committee. He was afraid of it looking like the “Negroes” were taking over the Democratic party platform, and that too many scared white people would vote Republican. (Sound familiar?) After this election the racial alignment of the parties did shift, starting in the South.

In 1971 it was inconvenient that Hamer co-founded the National Women’s Political Caucus, created “to increase the number of women in all aspects of political life—as elected and appointed officials, as judges in state and federal courts, and as delegates to national conventions.”

More than anything else, it was inconvenient that Hamer told her story so eloquently, authentically, and clearly. It was inconvenient that people couldn’t ignore her words. “…but if I can’t tell the truth—just tell me to sit down—because I have to tell it like it is.”

At her funeral service in 1977 Andrew Young said, “None of us would be where we are today had she not been here then.”

Here are my sources and some really great resources:
Film, “This Little Light of Mine, The Legacy of Fannie Lou Hamer” https://www.fannielou.com/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fannie_Lou_Hamer
http://www.crmvet.org/docs/flh64.htm
https://timeline.com/hamer-speech-voting-rights-d5f6ddc7470a
This is a very interesting text laying out the racial politics in the US during the 1964 election. It has everything to do with what we are seeing now:
https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2001/spring/lbj-and-white-backlash-1.html

 

Female Power Project, Inscriptions

Inscriptions, a new series

So new it’s not in the menu yet!

Here is a promising start to a new series: Inscriptions. The public display of words shows us the ideas we think our society is founded on. Inscriptions are all over the place here in DC. There’s no public building or monument without an inscription. Click on the images to see a larger picture. The first image shows the final state of “Inscription I” made from a photo I captured of the Department of Justice building—printed on stretched canvas, with hand embroidery. 20 inches square. (More coming soon.)

The canvas is heavy and to make my stitches I have to punch hard with the needle. The thread makes a kind of moan as I pull it through the coated, heavy, printed fabric. Punch (pierce) moooooan, punch (pierce) moooooan, punch (pierce) moooooan . . .  The second image shows the stitching in progress, from the back. Light shines through the holes. Stitching is a “feminine” art, so this series is part of the #FemalePowerProject

 

Female Power Project, perSISTERS designs, What I'm Making

PAY ATTENTION honoring Rachel Carson

Revised design, August 2018

Here is a new perSISTERS design in the #FemalePowerProject for Rachel Carson.

First it is important to understand the times in which Rachel Carson’s attention changed the world. Nature was perceived as a threatening realm in opposition to humans, something that we need to control. Humans were making amazing progress in that regard. The late 1950s was a time of unprecedented prosperity that depended on the exploitation of technologies which had flourished because of wartime investment.

The US and its allies had recently vanquished fascism while creating explosions rivaled only by volcanic forces. It seemed like “man” could do anything: conquer disease with antibiotics; stop plaques with pesticides; create amazing yields with synthetic fertilizers; and…kill billions of living things with one explosion. Not just the explosion—it was the rain of nuclear fallout that spread far and wide afterwards that could wipe out whole populations—something that could not be seen or tasted or touched. This eventually created a profound anxiety. The immense power to control nature first created an optimism about human progress. It took a while for people to realize that this control was also a frightening power that was being deployed heedlessly and without forethought. Rachel Carson was responsible for that reorientation.

Carson had described nature (mostly the shore and the sea) with beautiful language that created a feeling for the delicate and amazing web of interconnected lives and processes. This aesthetic dimension was essential to the power of her message. It could motivate people to cherish the living web that held us up. Not just because humans might perish without it, but also because it is worth saving in itself—it has a value outside of human utility. That is stewardship, a value on which the environmental movement would be founded. Carson saw that human arrogance was outrunning wisdom and she sought to put them in balance. This was accomplished by widening our scope of examination in space and in time. The effects of certain agents might not be evident here and now, but in more distant places and times.

Carson also saw that scientific research was affected by the profit motive of corporations and she called for decisions to made based on more impartial science. One of her biographers, Linda Lear, says in The American Experience
“She is calling for the population to understand that money has a great deal to do with what is done in science. We need to ask who speaks and why. What is done in the name of science and why doesn’t the public have a right to know? These are not just scientific questions. These are questions that a social revolutionary asks.”

Rachel Carson’s goal was to shift the paradigm about humans and nature. She accomplished this not as a scientist, but as a master synthesizer of scientific information and a gifted communicator of science. She also fought hard to convince those in power to heed her alarm. This they did. And she accomplished this before she died of breast cancer at 56.

from Wikipedia:
Rachel Louise Carson (May 27, 1907 – April 14, 1964) was an American marine biologist, author, and conservationist whose book Silent Spring and other writings are credited with advancing the global environmental movement.

Carson began her career as an aquatic biologist in the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries, and became a full-time nature writer in the 1950s. Her widely praised 1951 bestseller The Sea Around Us won her a U.S. National Book Award and recognition as a gifted writer. Her next book, The Edge of the Sea, and the reissued version of her first book, Under the Sea Wind, were also bestsellers. This sea trilogy explores the whole of ocean life from the shores to the depths.

Late in the 1950s, Carson turned her attention to conservation, especially some problems that she believed were caused by synthetic pesticides. The result was the book Silent Spring (1962), which brought environmental concerns to an unprecedented share of the American people. Although Silent Spring was met with fierce opposition by chemical companies, it spurred a reversal in national pesticide policy, which led to a nationwide ban on DDT and other pesticides. It also inspired a grassroots environmental movement that led to the creation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.